Quine-McCluskey minimization method uses the same theorem to
produce the solution as the K-map method, namely X(Y+Y')=X
- The expression is represented
in the canonical SOP form if not already in that form.
- The function is converted into
numeric notation.
- The numbers are converted into
binary form.
- The minterms are arranged in a
column divided into groups.
- Begin with the minimization
procedure.
- Each minterm of one group is
compared with each minterm in the group immediately below.
- Each time a number is found in
one group which is the same as a number in the group below except for one
digit, the numbers pair is ticked and a new composite is created.
- This composite number has the
same number of digits as the numbers in the pair except the digit
different which is replaced by an "x".
- The above procedure is repeated
on the second column to generate a third column.
- The next step is to identify
the essential prime implicants, which can be done using a prime implicant
chart.
- Where a prime implicant covers
a minterm, the intersection of the corresponding row and column is marked
with a cross.
- Those columns with only one
cross identify the essential prime implicants. -> These prime
implicants must be in the final answer.
- The single crosses on a column
are circled and all the crosses on the same row are also circled,
indicating that these crosses are covered by the prime implicants
selected.
- Once one cross on a column is
circled, all the crosses on that column can be circled since the minterm
is now covered.
- If any non-essential prime
implicant has all its crosses circled, the prime implicant is redundant
and need not be considered further.
- Next, a selection must be made
from the remaining nonessential prime implicants, by considering how the
non-circled crosses can be covered best.
- One generally would take those
prime implicants which cover the greatest number of crosses on their row.
- If all the crosses in one row
also occur on another row which includes further crosses, then the latter
is said to dominate the former and can be selected.
- The dominated prime implicant
can then be deleted.
Find the minimal sum of products for the Boolean expression,
Firstly these minterms are represented in the binary form as
shown in the table below. The above binary representations are grouped into a
number of sections in terms of the number of 1's as shown in the table below.
Binary representation of minterms
|
Minterms
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
7
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
8
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
9
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
10
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
11
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
14
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
15
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Group of minterms for different number of 1's
|
No of 1's
|
Minterms
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
1
|
8
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
9
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
2
|
10
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
3
|
7
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
3
|
11
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
3
|
14
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
4
|
15
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Any two numbers in these groups which differ from each other by
only one variable can be chosen and combined, to get 2-cell combination, as
shown in the table below.
2-Cell combinations
|
Combinations
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
|
(1,3)
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
|
(1,9)
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
(2,3)
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
|
(2,10)
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
(8,9)
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
(8,10)
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
|
(3,7)
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|
(3,11)
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
(9,11)
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
|
(10,11)
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
|
(10,14)
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
|
(7,15)
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
(11,15)
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|
(14,15)
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
From the 2-cell combinations, one variable and dash in the same
position can be combined to form 4-cell combinations as shown in the figure
below.
|
Combinations
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
|
(1,3,9,11)
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
1
|
|
(2,3,10,11)
|
-
|
0
|
1
|
-
|
|
(8,9,10,11)
|
1
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
|
(3,7,11,15)
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
|
(10,11,14,15)
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
The cells (1,3) and (9,11) form the same 4-cell combination as
the cells (1,9) and (3,11). The order in which the cells are placed in a
combination does not have any effect. Thus the (1,3,9,11) combination could be
written as (1,9,3,11).
From above 4-cell combination table, the prime implicants table
can be plotted as shown in table below.
Prime Implicants Table
|
Prime Implicants
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
14
|
15
|
|
(1,3,9,11)
|
X
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
(2,3,10,11)
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
(8,9,10,11)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
|
(3,7,11,15)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
-
|
X
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
The columns having only one cross mark correspond to essential
prime implicants. A yellow cross is used against every essential prime
implicant. The prime implicants sum gives the function in its minimal SOP form.
Y = V'X + V'W + UV' + WX + UW







0 comments:
Post a Comment